I'll confess I really loved this movie though watching at the theatre, but nevertheless on the walk to the LRT station just after, the novelty was soon sporting off, as all I could assume about was the key missed possibilities. Minus the Benjamin Button adaptation (which sucked), I'd never have thought that this would happen with a Fincher flick. And furthermore, I was somewhat baffled to log on and see all the glowing opinions of this movie. Watch The Social Network Online
This isn't a undesirable movie strictly talking, but it isn't a wonderful one either. It's dialogue is superb, as is the songs by Trent Reznor (I cherished the funky Hall Of The Mountain King in the race scene, and as is the acting and directing, so I definitely can't arrive down on it really hard on the point that it's, for the most portion, a very well developed film.
Of course there's heading to be award buzz for this film, it was directed by David Fincher. The acting is certainly good, in reality it's PHENOMENAL. The ideal issue about the acting (and the entire movie) is Andrew Garfield's performance, as I will be baffled if he doesn't get nominated.
Now like I claimed, I appreciated it although I was watching it. But recently I've been thinking about it and I can't say it's a particularly excellent film.
The movie skips back and forth involving the trial and the occasions which surrounded the generating of The Facebook. This operates in the to start with half, hut then when Sean Parker comes in, it will get bothersome, as the cutting back again and forth turns into more and more continuous. Why can't you just present the complete unadulterated scene? Is it seriously that vital to display Eduardo stating it as opposed to the words arrive out of Sean Parker's mouth, or to demonstrate Eduardo stating "Then he said" then minimize to Sean Parker? If you're gonna minimize back and forth and wreck the suspense of a scene, why even comprise of it at all?
This is an illustration of the "patches".I pointed out in the title. The film is patched with each other as opposed to getting a seamless tale staying advised. seventy five% of the film will take site in the office in the course of the lawsuits and depositions. At this level the suspense is ruined for us due to the fact we already know Eduardo is suing mark. So why give it away early in the if you *want* to give the audience a rationale to treatment about the characters?
One more issue incorrect with the film is that the theme isn't readily created across rather effortlessly. The most glaring instance is a potent scene close to the finish wherever Eduardo, the jealous soul, provides Mark, a jerk, hell for supplying him a beneath-charge test. It's impressive, it's very well acted, even tough to watch. But it's missing the most vital point: The total theme. We don't get something about jealousy and/or greed. At the finish, We see Mark add his previous girlfriend add her as a colleague on facebook. Does this say something about the asshole he definitely is? About how shitty of a boyfriend he is and even also, how shitty of a businessman he is, that he became the youngest billionaire in the entire world for the wrong causes? No. It doesn't say something about becoming an asshole. Like I mentioned, the theme is missing.
This isn't a undesirable movie strictly talking, but it isn't a wonderful one either. It's dialogue is superb, as is the songs by Trent Reznor (I cherished the funky Hall Of The Mountain King in the race scene, and as is the acting and directing, so I definitely can't arrive down on it really hard on the point that it's, for the most portion, a very well developed film.
Of course there's heading to be award buzz for this film, it was directed by David Fincher. The acting is certainly good, in reality it's PHENOMENAL. The ideal issue about the acting (and the entire movie) is Andrew Garfield's performance, as I will be baffled if he doesn't get nominated.
Now like I claimed, I appreciated it although I was watching it. But recently I've been thinking about it and I can't say it's a particularly excellent film.
The movie skips back and forth involving the trial and the occasions which surrounded the generating of The Facebook. This operates in the to start with half, hut then when Sean Parker comes in, it will get bothersome, as the cutting back again and forth turns into more and more continuous. Why can't you just present the complete unadulterated scene? Is it seriously that vital to display Eduardo stating it as opposed to the words arrive out of Sean Parker's mouth, or to demonstrate Eduardo stating "Then he said" then minimize to Sean Parker? If you're gonna minimize back and forth and wreck the suspense of a scene, why even comprise of it at all?
This is an illustration of the "patches".I pointed out in the title. The film is patched with each other as opposed to getting a seamless tale staying advised. seventy five% of the film will take site in the office in the course of the lawsuits and depositions. At this level the suspense is ruined for us due to the fact we already know Eduardo is suing mark. So why give it away early in the if you *want* to give the audience a rationale to treatment about the characters?
One more issue incorrect with the film is that the theme isn't readily created across rather effortlessly. The most glaring instance is a potent scene close to the finish wherever Eduardo, the jealous soul, provides Mark, a jerk, hell for supplying him a beneath-charge test. It's impressive, it's very well acted, even tough to watch. But it's missing the most vital point: The total theme. We don't get something about jealousy and/or greed. At the finish, We see Mark add his previous girlfriend add her as a colleague on facebook. Does this say something about the asshole he definitely is? About how shitty of a boyfriend he is and even also, how shitty of a businessman he is, that he became the youngest billionaire in the entire world for the wrong causes? No. It doesn't say something about becoming an asshole. Like I mentioned, the theme is missing.
No comments:
Post a Comment